Through the Lens: National Geographic greatest photograph

Picture in scrutiny:
Caption:
An off-duty sergeant in the Israeli Army lets down his guard for a kiss in West Jerusalem's Zion Square
Photographer:
Annie Griffiths Belt
Picture composition:
Medium long shot. Rule of thirds in place, with 1/3 of area covered by the couple and 2/3 of area covered by the the public, giving a very natural setting. This composition serves to show the contrast between the people(background) and the couple(foreground) which allows audiences to read that the couple are not in their private domain.
Semiotics at work:
Denotation
At face level, this picture basically denotes a man and a woman kissing at a square.
Conotation
However, with conotation, we learn that there are positive as well as negative readings into this picture.
Positive connotation
The presence of a soldier gives a sense of tension, dominance in authority and war. These are negative associations we tie to soldiers. However, the army personnel in this picture seems to be in a relaxed position, with almost a blissful emotion on his face. This creates a pleasant and peaceful atmosphere.
The picture below is yet another example of a pleasant atmosphere in the presence of a soldier. Soldiers, a representation of brutality and violence are here pictured as war heroes in a pleasant light.
Negative Connotation
Soldiers are expected to be a highly disciplined unit and standing in an upright posture like in the picture below. In contrast, the picture in discussion portrays the soldier in a laid back and slack manner, indicating a lax in discipline.
Understanding the Signs:
Iconic
The couple is publically displaying their affection for one another. This pda-ing is iconic of love.
Indexical
Gun and Soldier's uniform will lead to notions of violence, military and war. However, it can also lead to people viewing them as the 'heroes', 'patriots' or even 'protectors'.
Symbolic
1) Act of kissing would most commonly be read as feelings of love and endearment. However, in some cultural context, it may also be read as a form of greeting.
2) The western looking architecture/building found at the backdrop of the photo in analysis shows an importation of foreign architectural culture into the country's culture. It suggests a sense of globalization, with culture and ideas exchanged across borders and countries becoming more cosmopolitan.
For one who is familiar with the Israeli historical culture, the architecture actually reflects the culture importation from France. (The picture above is of a building in Lyon, France.)
3) Crew cut hair together with the green uniform symbolizes the typical outward appearance of a soldier.
4) The crest on the sleeve of the soldier's uniform represents the rank which the soldier is in. In this case it is the rank of a sergeant. For an Israeli soldier, it might be more familiar because he is part of the army. However, for an external audience, they might only be able to identify it as a representation of a soldier's place in the army hierarchy.
Metonymy
1) Circle of Harmony
The circle of harmony is a kind of unity which portrays a group of people sharing the same values in one way or another. It shows that they probably share a kind of relationship with one another or are part of the same community. This is evidently seen in the various circles drawn out in the following picture.
2) Soldiers are a metonymy of War
....as it is their duty to represent their nation to fight.
Irony
1) Reversal of roles.
Boys are often labelled as the 'skirtchasers'. However, for the picture in analysis, the active participant seems to be the lady. This is because she is easing forward towards the soldier to earn a kiss. The passive participant on the other hand is the soldier who is withdrawn and in the accepting position of the 'kiss'.
2)Violence vs Romance
In this photograph, the theme of war and love is highly juxaposed.
Soldier is representative of war, and War= hatred, misery, brutality. While couple is an embodiment of love, and Love= all encompassing, peaceful, blissfulness/happiness.
Modality
Low modality
Inappropriateness of carrying a gun in this situation makes some audiences skeptical about the authenticity of this picture. (It might be a contrived shot). People from other cultures might not understand the procedural system of patrolling in Israel and might question if the 'slack' behavior of a soldier and compare it to the understanding of their own cultures.
Also, some audiences who do not recognize the gun as being unloaded might fail to understand the 'relaxed' behavior of the soldier.
High modality
Audiences could believe this photograph as a snapshot of reality. It looks candid and the picture is composed in such a way that the public are not obscured. There is no obvious focus on only the couple.
The photograph below is another example of a candid photograph of the soldiers at the Zion Square. It shows the soldiers mingling within the public, sitting in a casual posture and chatting with one another. It were almost as if they were not in their army uniforms! (and notice the circle of harmony again!)
There might be high modality for our photograph in analysis due to the use of medium: The national geographic magazine. This is considered a credible source as it is a magazine which publishes about the truths of the world. Hence, audiences are likely to trust what they will see in the magazine. Similarly in the example below, the picture looks suspiciously 'posed', like a Hollywood scene. But this is a famous iconic photograph published in LIFE magazine which marks V-J day, the surrender of the Japanese in the WWII. Hence, there will be a high modality, due to the usage of medium.
Intertextuality
The picture is taken at the Zion Square in Jerusalem of Israel. Audiences who have been there will be familiar with the background.
Also, the crest rank is also the representation of the Israel Military authority.
Peer Evaluation
Mr Reddy commented that our slides seem to examine how the picture would be read in the Singapore culture. We have thus, somewhat obscured what other audiences might have read about the photograph. Hence in this blog, I have tried to steer away from analyzing in our context.
Also, he commented that the kiss between the man and the woman seems quite 'cold' and unpassionate. However, I would beg to differ. The lack of touch in the hands of the couple might have given the idea that they are not that passionately in love (man seems to be pushing the woman's hand away), however, this is because in the lady's hands, she is clutching a pair of sunglasses, which might have interfered or obstructed the closeness they shared. Even though there isn't much expression in the faces of the couple, it seems that they are sharing a soft, sweet moment together.
I personally enjoyed the presentation by jie ying and chew yue most. I thought that they had analyzed the posters pretty holistically. Also, I agree with them about the poster's use of creativity and humor that might have undermined the modality of the message.
I would rate them 9.5/10
Even though our presentation emphasized quite abit on the Singapore context, I think we managed to do a rather rounded analysis of our photograph, with many examples of other photographs to back up our stand.
On this note, I will rate my team's score against Chew yue and Jie ying 9.20/10




























